On being a "pure theist" — and some commentary on Kojève's "Atheism"
I offer a similar criticism of Kojeve on the grounds that he fundamentally distorts the position of the "mystics" in my notes on Intro to Hegel
My notes on *Kojeve's* Intro to Hegel, not the Houlgate one, naturally
"For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night."
In Kabbalah, God is described by AIN (nothingness) which, rearranged is ANI ("I").
I offer a similar criticism of Kojeve on the grounds that he fundamentally distorts the position of the "mystics" in my notes on Intro to Hegel
My notes on *Kojeve's* Intro to Hegel, not the Houlgate one, naturally
"For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night."
In Kabbalah, God is described by AIN (nothingness) which, rearranged is ANI ("I").